Find a Lawyer

SHAHTAJ SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, KARACHI

R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Regulatory excise duty on manufacture of sugar manufacturer without challenging the imposition of duty or any protest and without claiming a refund within one year. , Regulatory Duty Submission. After six years the aggravation of this claim, and the principles of leach and waiver, will also go against the manufacturer's principles.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ZAFAR IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 2009 SCMR 1488
• ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD 2009 SCMR 1492
• ROZNAMA HAMDARD through Chief Editor v. HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION PAKISTAN 2009 CLD 1523
• STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. FRANKLIN CREDIT AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD. through Attorney 2009 CLD 1542
• Dr. ZAHOOR MEHDI v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN/RETURNING OFFICER FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ISLAMABAD 2009 PLD 1
• MAH GUL v. State 2009 SCMR 4
• BASHIR AHMED v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2009 PLD 11
• Mst. NASIM AKHTAR v. ABDUL RASHID KHAN 2009 SCMR 12

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

top advocate from Jatoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes