Sections 302 (b), 302 (c), 324 and 337 A00, despite the fact that the witnesses knew the accused, his name was not included in the FIR, which only led to his It was pointed out that he was not present on the spot. Immediately after the police registered the case, upon inquiry reports of the two victims, the other witnesses of the prosecution identified the two victims, which also showed the absence of witnesses, in which the identification parade was not recovered. Had happened The pistol or crime blank or clothes or blood stained ground does not link the accused to the crime, according to the Judicial Magistrate, after all the formal operations were recorded but the defense suggested that it was unnecessary after the crime. After being taken into judicial custody, there was nothing available to deny the conviction of the accused, which had to be rejected or admitted altogether, in which the defendant claimed that he had fired at both victims. One victim was unarmed while the other had a kick to the dead, on the contrary, the accused was armed with firearms. He was injured. On both sides of the chest, an important part of the body was charged, therefore, it exceeded the right of self-defense; the offense under section 2302 (b) proved to be, consequently, the P.P.C. Was changed to section 2302 (c), PPC and its death sentence. He was reduced to 14 years on two counts of simultaneous driving while the charges were dismissed under sections 324 and 337A (ii), PPC because he did not Confession was a crime, and neither
