MIAN MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R 8 Representation for the Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), Section 14 (6), reviewing the decision of the Supreme Court, the interim relief applicant was approved. Although the petitioner did not appear in accordance with the notice issued, however, the Supreme Court could change the application for leave to appeal and the fresh notice should have been issued for its full hearing. The interpretation given by Section 14 (6) of the Representation People Act, 1976 was challenged not only by the applicant but also by the federal government. Although the High Court, despite changing the order of the Returning Officer, had allowed the petitioner to continue in the post of Chief Minister, the decision under consideration did not separate him from the post and the new circumstances, namely Governor Raj. Was terminated. And at the next day's meeting of the Provincial Assembly, there was the possibility of selecting a new Chief Minister who could change the color of the present case. Can The refusal of interim relief, which was not even disputed by the Attorney General over concerns, was considered sufficient to establish such a court through the Supreme Court, while the request was directed that the final settlement be made. Until then, the decision process pending will be suspended and the applicant will resume work effect r \ n The Office of the Chief Minister with immediate effect
