Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD MISKEEN

Section 18 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 declaration and acquisition of land for land acquisition transactions, section 18, demarcation act, 1908 were not available to the legal heritage of the original transfer when He lived by himself. 53 years after this transaction and seeing the transfer from another village to occupy his property in that village. If there had been fraud, the actual transfer would not have been silent for more than half a century

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• RASHID AKHTAR v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 723
• RIAZ AHMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 725
• Mian MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 SCMR 727
• ZIA-UR-REHMAN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, POSTAL SERVICES, ABBOTTABAD 2009 PLC(CS) 728
• HAMID ALI v. State 2009 SCMR 734
• ALLAH NAWAZ v. State 2009 SCMR 736
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN v. Mst. MEHR-UN-NISA 2009 SCMR 740
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. SAMPAK PAPER AND BOARD MILLS 2009 CLD 741

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes