Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The suit for declaration of suit property was transferred by the Central Government in favor of the applicant's brother and the brother of the petitioner stated that the owner of the mutation. The suit land, in favor of the selling land respondents, was then canceled by the collector, at the request of the applicants / shopkeeper's other family, whereby the suit land in favor of the applicant's brother. I was changed. The suitors were acquitted at the same time by the following courts and the High Court granted the petitioners' brother's right in whose favor the land was exchanged, saying that the respondents and the applicants were family members. Since the land was not challenged, he said that up to the time order for canceling the entries in the tax register, the collector had bought the suit property from the petitioner's brother and the applicants had deliberately made it available to the respondents / shopkeepers. The truth was hidden and the respondents did not implement them Since the party High Court had correctly ruled that the modification was canceled, the applicants received the application without the enforcement of the respondents / buyers. Land as a party; and it said that the order had no legal effect on the rights of the purchasers / buyers; in the absence of any defect in the nomination order, justifying the intervention by the Supreme Court. Holiday request dismissed
