Find a Lawyer

NASRULLAH versus MUHAMMAD ZAHEER

Article 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The entire case of applicants suing for partition rested on the distribution document Minutes of this document, Purcell revealed that this document deals with some other property. And it has nothing to do with property. The controversial trial court, the appellate court as well as the High Court, after keeping the oral and documentary evidence of the parties, had also ruled that the facts connected with the facts could not be interfered with in the absence of any. Do not read errors or legal errors or misrepresentations or evidence

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ALLAH NAWAZ v. State 2009 SCMR 736
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN v. Mst. MEHR-UN-NISA 2009 SCMR 740
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. SAMPAK PAPER AND BOARD MILLS 2009 CLD 741
• KHALIL AHMAD v. REHMAT ALI 2009 SCMR 742
• MUHAMMAD ABDUL RASHEED v. JAMIA MASJID GHOSIA 2009 SCMR 747
• MUHAMMAD ASHIQ v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE through Chairman 2009 SCMR 749
• MUHAMMAD QURAB KHAN v. State 2009 PLD 749
• ZOHRA KHANUM v. State 2009 SCMR 751

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

divorce advocates from Upper Deval lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes