The discovery of the evidence of Sections 302 (b), 365A and 201 Constitution (10 of 1984), Article 40 evidence led the two accused to retrieve the body, based on information presented to the investigating officer in separate investigations. Before Nala reported that no one was aware of the body's detection and that the same could be disclosed under Article 40 of the Legal Evidence, the unnatural death of an 18-year-old boy in 1984 resulted in medical evidence. The source was proved, seeing the shoes, belts and pants of the doctor and the deceased father's statement that his father had identified the body, so it can not be said that The identity of the victim was not proved by the evidence obtained, the complainant and his wife received telephone calls and demanded ransom and the defendants were threatened that the ransom was not paid. Their son will be fined. The scooter was recovered by the accused after his arrest, after the arrest of the scout revealed by the accused, who at the time of his arrest, alleged that he had recovered a variety of articles. ? In their case, the accused had killed an 18-year-old student boy in ransom and there was no mitigating situation in his favor. The accused's appeals were dismissed in the circumstances.
