ABDUL RASHID versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, POST OFFICES, ISLAMABAD
Section 4 Constitution Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Repeal Delay Deletion Delegation of Representation of Departments On 25 25 1998, the authorities reduced salaries by two stages Imposed a sentence of The civil servant, who repeatedly filed an appeal before the service tribunal within the time prescribed under the law, and subsequently filed an appeal before the service tribunal on 19-11 2003 under which the authorities The appeal against the order passed by the service tribunal was rejected and dismissed. Negligence and negligence The public servant was neither aggravating the matter before the competent authority, nor was the service tribunal justified in dismissing the appeal of the public servant within the prescribed period because of time restriction. It could not then be extended only for the duration of the period itself. The delay was a concession day to justify every day's delay, but the government employees delayed their request for condolences for no compelling reason / grounds for condolences after the service tribunal examined the entire record. Comprehensively reviewed all the controversial questions of law and fact. The Laws Service Tribunal exercised its discretion with justice, which was not understandable, so the law drawn by the Service Tribunal was in accordance with the law and, according to the rules of justice, the Supreme Court ruled on behalf of the Service Tribunal. No confusion or illegal interference could be guaranteed in the judgment presented. The tribunal was final which could not be challenged unless it read false news
