RAJA MUHAMMAD NASEEM KHAN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Sections 8 and 6 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1977, R10 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VII of 1974), Sections 44 and 47 of the Civil Service. Theoretical Promotion After retirement, the authority applicant, who retired from the police service after serving an Omar sentence, instructed the authorities to take up the post of Section CPP / AIG (B19) for conceptual promotion. Consider the matter. Promotions against the two positions were vacated and the names of four other police officers were also added to it for consideration. The applicant claimed that at the time he was the only candidate who said that he met the requirement but was not considered and he retired, in which two persons were promoted to the post. On the basis of the charges, on the basis of working papers, it was alleged by the applicant that they had been discriminated against. The petitioner was not a bereaved person and the complaints raised by the application fall under the terms and conditions of service, the High Court had no jurisdiction to issue the direction sought by the applicant and the appropriate forum for his decision. There was a service tribunal. The jurisdiction of the High Court was dismissed under Section 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974. Were not in exclusive jurisdiction. Mandamus, the war warrant and the option to issue a writ of injunction cannot be said that it cannot be said in these circumstances.
