IFTIKHAR AHMED KHAN versus UNIVERSITY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Regarding the general rules and regulations of Sections 19 and 23, Rule 14 and 22 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 examines the degree to which false and forgery documents challenge the degree of the University. Syndicate has the ability to revoke the charge of It was against the applicant that he had obtained a degree by practicing fraud and the applicant was presented with a show cause notice under which he was required to respond to the allegation which caused the applicant to take action. Initially, the inquiry and the showcase notice challenged that it had also filed a petition against the accused. That the Syndicate of the University was not able to formulate a rule relating to the applicant's rules without the modification of the usual rules in Rule 22 which would result in the rule of Rule 22 excluding the University or Degree, diploma withdrawal options were denied. After three years of Parcel II and III Rule 22 of a candidate's certificate after Perry, the matter was not attracted because the matter was neither a matter of error in the declaration of a compilation or of the results nor of the appearance of the petition. Question of eligibility. In the proceedings initiated by the Syndicate, the committee comprising the Examination was constituted. Deemed necessary to do In 1985, the Syndicate was named the University's highest executive body, as well as Section 23 of the aforesaid Act.
