ABID HUSSAIN KHAN versus EHTESAB BUREAU THROUGH CHIEF PROSECUTOR
One condition for granting relief to the High Court's jurisdiction under section 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 was that under the jurisdiction of the High Court, the applicant should have no alternative alternative solution. ? Limited to the direction of the affairs of the law and no executive order could be made. The written jurisdiction could only be exercised where a public servant failed to perform his duty, under which he acted under the law. Or where he did something against it. The law, which was not allowed to do so by law, can exercise its jurisdiction in these matters and direct the state organs to do something that they were obliged to do or prevent them from doing. In the present case, the accountability court had a pre-arrest bail, pending the adjudication decision of the Accountability Bureau, the state's partial body, its chairman. Headed by a high court judge who was investigating the matter, discrimination With the question of such behavior or patronage, it would not arise that an investigation by the Accountability Bureau is still underway and no final decision was made against it. The applicant was free to join the petitioner's inquiry and to prove his innocence that the questions involved in this case were contradictory questions of fact, which could not be resolved in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. Examine the allegations in action
