AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY versus RAJA MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN
A. XXXIII, RR 2, 3, 4, 5 and Section 96 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Appeal for Recovery of Money from High Court Papers Suite on Section 46 Paper Suit for Recovery of Money The trial court ruled that the former plaintiff had disclosed that the trial court did not follow the procedure observed by A. XXXXII, CPC, in which O XXXIII, under R2 of CPC, dismissed the institution and the pauper suit. In order to provide a complete scheme, it was mandatory for the claimant. Ask for permission to sue as pauper. The application should include the necessary details of the case in relation to the case. The schedule of any movable or immovable belonging to the plaintiffs; its expected value was to be attached to it and such statement shall be signed and validated, which is set to sign and confirm the requests. Has been done Under R4 of O XXXIII, the CPC court must examine the applicants. And if it does not meet the requirements of O XXXIII, RR 2 and 3 of CPC, OXXIII will be rejected under R5 of the CPC, in the present case, the trial court O XXXIII, not on the provisions of CPC. Had passed The proceedings were carried out without the use of judicial mind, which it was the duty of every Judicial Officer to supply R2 of XXXXII, CPC was compulsory and there was no separation hearing procedure, in adopting the relevant procedure. Failure to Trial The whole proceeding, in the eyes of the law, is a motion where special procedure was provided for the performance of an act, whether or not it should be performed in a prescribed manner but on appeal by the defendants. Kb
