FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Section 3 [such as Azad Jammu and Kashmir Regulation of Notices and Pure Land (Amendment) Act 1989] Azad Jammu and Kashmir Pure Land Rules, 1985, R3 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V) (1908), O VII, R 11 The lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs for litigation to sue for proprietary rights was dismissed and the appellate court upheld the trial court's decision. The plaintiffs meant that they were native and to occupy the suit land, which has been the purest government ever since, given the rights of ownership under the grant of Nautner Kinna Nadda and Azad Jammu and Kashmir Pure Land Rules, 1985. Jammu and Kashmir regularized the notes and amended the Pure Land Ordinance grant in 1974, only those who were entitled to receive a grant of net land, which were notorious. n 15 6 1985 and the permanent occupation of the nativator and such record was recorded as if the plaintiff had not made any notice on the suit land and the record of income was not recorded in favor of the plaintiff in this connection. The litigation was also excluded from the suit land and due to non-entry of the revenue record and the expulsion of the suit land, the condition of continuous possession was terminated by the plaintiff, in the circumstances, did not grant the proprietary rights. And had no legal right in relation to the suit land. He was unable to establish it under section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, the Revenue Authorities deciding on the provision of proprietary rights under the Free State of Jammu and Kashmir Pure Land Rules, 1985. To the right and
