Find a Lawyer

KAMRAN SHEHZAD SIDDIQUI versus ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE

Article 199 Constitution Petition Extra District and Session Judges Recruitment Process and Standards Impact Petitioners' Different Standards Exhibition Challenges the Recruitment and Selection Judges and Procedures for Additional District and Session Judges Vacancies on the basis that two different The standards have been adopted. For the two tests and the candidates who got a score of less than 1% were called for interview, the applicants further claimed that the previous practice was that whoever got the 50% marks was given the other. Was allowed to sit in the exam. Neither the pass percentage nor the high skimming level was determined in the second test, nor was there any difference between the standard of the first test and the procedure and the standard was followed in the second test. The High Court had directed the constitutional applications that all the candidates who got more than 50% marks in the first examination and who were not allowed to appear in the second test will be given the opportunity of the second test.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 952
• MUHAMMAD JUNAID v. KARACHI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. 2010 YLR 952
• FAHAD v. QAID-E-AWAM UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NAWABSHAH through Vice-Chancellor 2010 CLC 955
• MIANDAD v. State 2010 MLD 956
• MUHAMMAD SALAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 957
• NASIR KHAN v. MUHAMMAD LATIF KAMBOO 2010 YLR 962
• Mst SAKINA KHATOON v. S.S. NAZIR AHSAN 2010 CLD 963
• NAIMAT KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 964

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Narang Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes