Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatim Um Bell, the grant of further investigative grievance was not an eyewitness to the incident, the proof of which could not be more than mere scientific assistance. There are two material witnesses. It may have been helpful in the case, was absconding and one of the cases was registered in the murder case; several submissions were made by the accused's lawyer, but for that reason it could not be said that the bail. Matters are deeply appreciated. The evidence was not valid The case of the accused was of further investigation and hardship as both the material witnesses could not be traced and the accused was detained from 13 12 2008, no evidence was produced by the prosecution on the last fifteen dates of the hearing. ? In the circumstances, the bail is admitted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
