Find a Lawyer

NAIMAT KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatil Um Bell, gave a grants-in-response version of the case where the accused involved in the incident suffered a firearm and survived, while the victim was on fire. After receiving his death. Injuries were lost to the accused, nothing was recovered from the accused except some cash and a pistol license was high, the accused party's claim that self-defense could not be claimed was only a fact in the present stage. I will be recorded when there is no proof. It has not yet been determined which party will take further action in the aggression by which time further investigation into the accused will be required, the accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• KAMRAN SHEHZAD SIDDIQUI v. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE 2010 PLC(CS) 957
• MUHAMMAD SALAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 957
• NASIR KHAN v. MUHAMMAD LATIF KAMBOO 2010 YLR 962
• Mst SAKINA KHATOON v. S.S. NAZIR AHSAN 2010 CLD 963
• TELECARD LTD. Through Deputy General Manager Finance, Karachi v. COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE (ENFORCEMENT), KARACHI 2010 PTD 967
• BARKAT ALI v. YAAR ALI 2010 MLD 972
• FAZAL-E-RABBI v. JUDGE BANKING COURT 2010 CLD 972
• NABI BUX alias NABOO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 979

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Farooqabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes