FAHAD versus QAID-E-AWAM UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NAWABSHAH THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
R8 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Domicile and Demand for Permanent Resident Certificate Required Certificate After completion of the Kodal formal process, the applicant is then admitted to the Executive District Officer, the applicant. Without hearing, the Executive District Officer canceled the certificate and in his absence the appeal filed by the applicant before the District Partner is pending. The ordinance officer, the university authority, where the applicant was a student, issued a show cause notice to the applicant, who filed a constitutional petition, which proved that the applicant had sufficient material on the record in which it was It was shown that the applicant was a resident of `B of the district and the certificate in question was issued by the Executive District Officer after completing all the Kodal formalities, stating that the Sindh Permanent Resident Certificate Rules, 1971 R Under 8 (1), no fraud was committed in issuing the certificate to the applicant: Executive Dissertation The cut officer had no authority over the law. The same authority relaxed with the District Coordination Officer, but did not cancel the certificate in the questionnaire, filing an appeal through the applicant would not give the jurisdiction of the District Coordination Officer where the applicant was studying. He was not authorized to issue show cause notices. Based on an order revoked by the Executive District Officer (Revenue) certificate, \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
