Sections 209 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Exxonx, RR1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Declaration Interim Order Prohibition, Supply of Essential Components Prima facie Case Scope Assets And features of a company-owned suit. The property was owned by the plaintiff company and the plaintiffs claimed to be the proprietor on the basis that the majority shareholding of the company in their predecessor's interest was that the company was a separate legal entity and that it did not own the assets and the assets. To the shareholders. The shareholding that was held and owned in the company that stood by his name and did not mean that he owns the company's assets, which includes the question, the plaintiff cannot claim the deceased's share in the company. Had no right or interest in any of the Company's assets, including suit property, for the plaintiff to successfully maintain an application for interim relief, the necessary components necessary for such relief are those of the plaintiff. Be in favor of The plaintiff must first establish a frivolous case and the same matter should always be examined in the context of the application under consideration and the plaintiff should show that he had a basic fiduciary issue for the grant ? The relief that he was looking for in the property in question was the sole revenue generating asset of this company and it was not the plaintiff, but the company, which could suffer irreparable loss and injury, if this application is allowed. They will lose the company as a result. The only source of income was the plaintiff was not entitled to interim relief
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
