TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION THROUGH TEHSIL MUNICIPAL OFFICER, WAZIRABAD versus PERVAIZ MASIH
Sections 1 (4), 3, 15 (2), 16 and 17 of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934), sections 1, 2 (g) (i) and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the constitutional petition of the municipal committee Employees claimed the claim was paid under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 for working overtime hours and directed the municipal committee to submit a claim to the employees for payment to the municipal committee. Under the Payment of Salary Act, 1936, the Authority had. There is no jurisdiction to decide matters because the municipal committee was not `factory` and payment over time can only be made by payment of employees by a factory or railway under section 1 (4) of the Act, 1936. The committee was covered by the Factories Act, 1934, under the Factories Act, 1934, to find out what justified the idity manufacturing process, as described in section 2 (g) of the Factories Act, 1934. Whether the municipal committee is earning or not? The process of converting the trash into a fertilizer through mechanical process, which was the production of raw materials collected by the employees, was established under the administration of the municipality, yet the quality of knowing about the rights of the employees through the nature of the work. Will be fixed. They do not have to work in the `factory closed area '. Nature and consequences of employment will determine the jurisdiction of the authority under the Salary Payment Act, 1936. Had to Employees' legitimate claims cannot be defeated because the authority made salaries
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
