BANK OF PUNJAB, LAHORE versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE
Sections 45 (4) and 47 of the Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Sections 57 (4), 86 and 87 (2) (b) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 30 (4) of the High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume V, Chapter 1, Part A, Rr 9 and 9A Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Appeals to the High Court of Labor Court Limitation for filing an appeal by the office of the High Court and delaying resignation within six days, with the expiry of the time limit set forth in section 47 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 filed within a timely return against With an application under section 5 of the Detention Act 1908. The High Court's Office dismissed the appeal by the Labor Appellate Tribunal after the Appeal barred the transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the Labor Appellate Tribunal under section 86 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 Later the transfer of the appeal was banned. Objections by the Office of the High Court for the absence of objections to judicial fees on labor cases under section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 and section 353 (4) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 Was verified. A legitimate withdrawal of an appeal by the High Court Office will mean that its filing was invalid, therefore, the appeal is established for purposes of limitation It cannot be considered that the removal of the objection by the Office of the High Court The designated period will not prevent this period from running. Until the filing of the appeal, the date of the objection by the office of the High Court shall not be excluded under the Act, under88. The Appellant shall have such objections before the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
