Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus RENT CONTROLLER/CIVIL JUDGE, 1ST CLASS, MULTAN

Section 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Dismissal and the application was dismissed under Section 12 (2); Gone. Section 11, CPC asserts that the second petition was affected by the principle of Res Judeta, a petition which was rejected by the controller of rent was filed constitutional petition in the second petition on additional grounds for property damage. The question contained in the law did not prohibit the filing of another petition. Additional grounds will grant the right to file a second eviction application

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 500
• SHAH JAHAN DOGAR v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman 2010 PLC(CS) 502
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 504
• M. ASIF ALI KHAN v. GHULAM SHABBIR 2010 YLR 507
• ARSHAD WAHEED v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2010 PLD 510
• MUHAMMAD AAMIR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 512
• AMJAD ALI v. State 2010 YLR 512
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION through Tehsil Municipal Officer, Wazirabad v. PERVAIZ MASIH 2010 PLC 513

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Hunza Nagar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes