Arts 25, 18 and I99 Privatization Commission Ordinance (LII of 2000), Proposed Privatization (Methods and Procedures) Rules, 2001 Privatization Commission (Recruitment of Valuers) Regulations, 2001 Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XXII of 2002) The joint venture agreement between the provincial government and a private company for the exploitation of public procurement rules, the 2004 Constitution, Iron Ore, etc., was, in the present case, in the interest of some with the private company and not in the public interest. Public workers were public property watchers. They should protect and protect public property as a lioness protects her children, even demanding strict accountability by the public workers in the broader interest of justice and institutional building under the supervision of this sacred trust and public trust. Goes Public participation was a misuse of public trust and violation of Articles 25 and 18 of the Joint Constitution Treaty Agreements, in which case it was called against the law, public policy, national interest, public transparency and fair use of discretion. Was. The High Court had directed the Chairman NAB to conduct a detailed inquiry into the guidelines for the elimination or transfer of public property by state-owned, semi-government and sovereign government entities. In the case of contract award to the chairman of a private company, NAB will present its inquiry R. The present order will ensure that the steps taken before the High Court within six months from the receipt of Advocate General, Punjab. That the copy of the present judgment be directed at the Government agencies of the Punjab
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
