MUNAWAR HUSSAIN KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH E.D.O. EDUCATION, MULTAN
O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and section 115 dismiss the request for review. Both the trial court and the appellate court rejected the steel application simultaneously. On examination of the material on record, the trial court granted the matter in relation to the grant. Considering the factors from all angles. And temporarily denied the injunction, the trial court upheld the appellate court's approval of the trial court for high, stable and enthusiastic reasons in support of its ruling, expressing the valid reasons for a limited civil review There was scope under which the High Court could not interfere with its review jurisdiction. The conclusions obtained under the applicant's counsel on the question of fact set by the two courts have claimed that there was a misunderstanding in the order passed by the two courts because of misreading of the material and not reading it. And failed to identify the illiterate. In Smart Finding, no one from the record could be bothered by the fact that the High Court did not use the scope of this amended jurisdiction without any indication or proof, in the trial judgment as well as in the trial. Had failed miserably to identify any kind of illegality or irregularity and the lower appellate court had refused to intervene. In reviewing the situation
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
