Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, DEPALPUR

Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Suit for restitution of constitutional petition, minority majority age-related marriage effect suit, was filed by the plaintiff for restitution allowance, trial on appeal Court Appeal Court raised Rs 500 to Rs 500 in rehabilitation 5,000 father stressed that he was caring for minor daughter till he attains majority age and now he is old As a result she was no longer entitled to care for them and did not accept their proposed marriage proposal, she excluded herself from any care. The father neglected the plaintiff (daughter) and his mother was raised and nurtured by the defendant. Should a competent marital girl not be forced to marry her father is bound to take care of his daughter

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Haji AHMED KHAN v. State 2010 MLD 515
• NASURALLAH KHAN v. UNIVERSITY OF GUJRAT through Vice-Chancellor 2010 PLC(CS) 515
• BANK OF PUNJAB, LAHORE v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2010 PLC 519
• Mst. YASMIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, OKARA 2010 YLR 519
• MUKHTAR AHMAD v. SULTAN AHMAD 2010 MLD 521
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through E.D.O. Education, Multan 2010 CLC 524
• Kh. ZAHID AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 526
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. RAHIM BAKHSH 2010 CLC 528

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Panjgur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes