GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY FOOD versus MADINA JUTE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR
Article 199 Constitutional application was entered into between the contracting parties under which the respondent was to pay Rs 51 per bag to the applicants by 2907 bales, the respondents complied with the terms and conditions of the contract. And supplied the required knots. Within the specified time, the appellants paid 48,494 rupees per bag instead of Rs 51 per party, and paid Rs 19,65,240 less than what they had to pay, according to the terms of the agreement between the respondents. On the failure of the appellant to pay the money, the defendant filed a constitutional petition before the High Court, which was approved by the High Court, the appellant filed an Intro-Court Appellant's assertion that the Constitution Petition filed before the High Court Could not be sustained as a factual dispute / contractual obligation included FA purely contractual obligation Article 199 could not properly constitute the subject of the proceedings, however, it cannot be ignored that it is a constitutional obligation of the State authorities to take appropriate action even when performing administrative tasks. Complaint before the court that the State had dealt unfairly or dishonestly with any party, or discriminated against any party who competed for the award of the contract, such complaint The High Court may also look into exercising its powers. If the issue of judicial review under Article 199 of the Constitution is satisfied to the court that during the course of the contract, the government had disobeyed or unfairly acted upon the obligations of the contract,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
