Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ANWAR-UL-HAQ versus STATE


Section 2 302 (b) Qatil MD immediately filed the definition of evidence, the FIR dismissed the possibility of consideration and consultation with the complainant. The accused had no enmity with the accused, and on the occasion he proved his presence that the accused's guilt, which was not challenged by him, resulted in section 230b (b). Was maintained, a similar role was played with the PPC co-accused, the trial related to the trial was not owned by the accused party, the FIR alleged that the incident was not possible. Before the incident was unearthed, the parties did not have a previous enmity; they were not supported by the medical examination, considering the facts. Factor was the reduction and that he was sentenced to life imprisonment the death penalty had been used in

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.