Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus D.E.O.

The constitutional petition for the Arts 204 and 1991 petitioner's biggest complaint was that the respondents were appointed as watchmen even though their names were not mentioned in the merit list, the contempt of court respondents / district education. The officer's statement was dealt with. The petitioners' complaint was decided to uproot the existing constitutional petition that, although the petitioner was involved in the proceedings of the District Education Officer, no order was issued by the District Education Officer in the case of the applicants. Was not done Provide the basis of your decision on the applicants under the duty \ according to the order of application \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. FAROOQ AHMAD 2010 YLR 1374
• RUSTAM v. State 2010 MLD 1376
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. GHULAM DASTGIR 2010 CLC 1376
• GLACIER INTERNATIONAL through Authorized representative v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE 2010 PTD 1376
• MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. State 2010 YLR 1379
• ANWAR-UL-HAQ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1380
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2010 YLR 1381
• MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ v. State 2010 MLD 1382

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes