Sections 239, 235, 234 and 233 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337 A (ii), 337 F (i), 337 F (ii), 337 F (v), 148 & 149 Qatl e amd and For the joint trial of the attempted murder and AMD, the accused have said that persons who have two different sets of charges for two different incidents cannot be summoned or prosecuted together. can go. Since the two accused were charged with committing the murder of the victim, the remaining accused had no alliance with the first episode. That two people were injured by the complainant in the second incident, and the locations of both incidents were completely different. That the distance between the two incidents was five furlongs. The second incident occurred at the time of the first episode of the incident when the injured man was evacuated at a distance of five furlongs and in the second incident two persons were injured by the accused on the complainant's side. Seen the episodes, was the real brother of the accused in the second installment who was charged with first felony, charged with first felony, and the second was the actual nephew of the accused in the accuracy section 239 (d), P.K. C heard a joint trial of two or two. More persons for various offenses, which are exempt from the exception to the exceptions stated in Section 233, Section 233 of the CCPC, and are included in Section 239 (d), a copy of the proceedings to the CRPC Had to avoid. The sets of the accused were interdependent and the possibility of their joint intention could not be ruled out, in which case both incidents were committed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
