Section 2 302 (b) / & Q & 2 342 The testimony of convicts and wrongful convictions made it clear to the witnesses that their presence at the scene of the incident made clear that the statements of eyewitnesses over time. The slightest disagreement was natural. The time to expunge the falsehood against the accused, the seat of injury and the nature of the injury provided essential support to the prosecution's version, and the medical evidence fully supported the ocular testimony, which cannot be ruled out. The matter was reported to the police immediately. The motive was established against the accused. The accused facilitated, guided, and took part in the incident. The trial court reviewed every aspect of the case in its original context and was correct. The conclusion was reached and the sentence was pronounced and the sentence was pronounced. Excluded accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
