Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), respondents to the section 552 eviction petition, filed a retraction petition against the appellant which denied the landlord and tenant tenant relationship which stated The landlord and tenant relationship was not present, the appellate court granted these parties. The order of appeal was challenged before the High Court, which rejected the defamation order and remanded the case to the first appellate court. In the post-remand proceedings, the appeal was again accepted, once the legitimate grounds under question were leased to the appellant who surrendered his possession but later on the basis of this document as a mortgagee. Which revealed that the loan was offered to the respondent by the appellant. The person in question took possession of the premises while agreeing to hand over the loan to the respondents on the payment of the loan offered by the appellant, saying that the document contains all the mortgagee components as per the Property Act, 1879. 52. As occupant and tenant as a resident, therefore, the rent controller has rightly ruled that the landlord and tenant relationship is non-existent, the appellate order between the two parties does not reflect the court's application of the mind. The correct application of the evidence and the request on record, therefore, was set aside by the appellate court's relevant law order and restored to the rent controller.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
