Before the trial of Article 6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition, the plaintiffs waived their signature on the written statement and the certified Clause trial court applied for permission to sign the written statement by the plaintiff. The Plaintiff had challenged the trial court. The Appellate Court, which rejected the trial court's order, could not have benefited from the failure to sign a written statement confirming the dismissal, while the evidence was pointed out by the plaintiff after the plaintiff. Requested for permission to sign the written statement immediately, the written statement was merely an irregular rule, or at any stage a technical error could be corrected. Failure to sign the petition due to technical misconduct cannot form the basis of the plaintiff's refusal and technical matters should not fail the course of justice and the matter must be decided. High court constitutional petition was allowed aside, the order of the Additional District Judge was set aside while the order of the Civil Judge was restored.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010