The defendant was not named in the FIR, pursuant to sections 2 (2 (b) and at 324 of the convicted AMD and evidence), and the complainant subsequently, in his supplemental statement, was involved in the case by the complainant. In his statement, there were crude reforms: Even in the court no details were given in the FIR which opened fire on the statements made by the injured witness, and on the next day after Vajitkar's testimony, the complainant's supplementary statement was recorded. In the dark hours of the night, there was no mention of the light source to indicate the allegations, as the former rang out. For this reason, the accused was involved in the post-mortem process through a supplementary statement, the statement of the deceased being recorded by the investigating officer without any credentials from the doctor. There was only a statement under Section 161, CR PC and the same could not be declared as death declaration. Nothing was recovered from the accused during the investigation. Was full of doubts and the accused deserved it. Its benefit was acquitted only in the case of the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
