Section 2 302 (b) of Qatil Ahmed's testimony was moved by the FIR as a motive for the accusation that the medical evidence had fully confirmed the ocular version and that the eyewitnesses testified against each other on every material aspect of the case. And their relationship with the deceased could not be established. Disqualifying their testimony in the absence of any previous hostility between the parties occurred on the day the parties knew each other's false identity, especially when the accused himself admitted that he had He was shot dead in self-defense. The delay in filing the FIR clearly explained that some of the minor contradictions made by the witnesses and their reforms had no adverse effect on their testimony, the defendant's request for bail and uncertain defense. Was also competent, but at the same time supported it. The prosecution's version, which would otherwise prove its facts and circumstances, appealed was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
