Find a Lawyer

NADEEM AZAM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT, JUDGE, SHUJABAD, MULTAN

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for restitution of marriage dissolution, care, dower and dowry articles Plaintiffs filed appeal for reinstatement and enhancement of dowry articles According to the petition filed by the appellate court in the trial court after setting additional matters in respect of the dowry articles, the trial court held that the proper evidence on record for properly framed cases relating to the dowry articles. No objection was raised by any concerned. The settlement of the dispute was remanded by the appellate court to the trial court because the remand will unnecessarily cause the case to be delayed. Family matters need to be decided without delay. The High Court had at the same time set aside the appellate court order. instructions r

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ALI SHER v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1582
• MUHAIYIMAD JAMAIL v. State 2010 MLD 1586
• Mian MAHMOOD-UL-HASSAN v. SPECIAL JUDGE, RENT TRIBUNAL, LODHRAN 2010 CLC 1590
• ALLAF HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1593
• Ghazi KHALID HUSSAIN FAKHAR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION TIRKHANWALA 2010 YLR 1598
• ZAHID MEHMOOD LATIF v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM LONE 2010 CLC 1598
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. AFAQ AHMAD 2010 MLD 1601
• SH. NIAZ AHMED v. UMER HAYAT KHAN KHARAL 2010 CLC 1601

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

list of advocates from Qambar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes