Find a Lawyer

SH. NIAZ AHMED versus UMER HAYAT KHAN KHARAL

Article 22 (vi) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint for dismissal of tenants not to apply for leave to take effect. Filing a withdrawal request before filing an application for The tenant controller ordered the dismissal of the appeal filed by the tenant, the appellate court tenant also held that he had applied for leave to contest the election within a time but the diary branch Because of her negligence, her application was included in the lawsuit filed with her. Respect for the same property The tenant's dispute that a vacation application was filed with another case to declare in connection with the rental premises provided the rent controller with numerous opportunities for the tenant to enter the application. I was unsuccessful. The tenant's constitutional application was rejected in LA I own

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• NADEEM AZAM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT, JUDGE, SHUJABAD, MULTAN 2010 CLC 1594
• Ghazi KHALID HUSSAIN FAKHAR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION TIRKHANWALA 2010 YLR 1598
• ZAHID MEHMOOD LATIF v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM LONE 2010 CLC 1598
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. AFAQ AHMAD 2010 MLD 1601
• EJAZ AHMAD alias JAJI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1606
• GHULAM YASEEN v. Haji IMAM BAKHSH 2010 YLR 1608
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. State 2010 MLD 1612
• SHAHADAT ALI v. State 2010 YLR 1613

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

inheritance advocates near Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes