A. XXIII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Decision on Consent to Declaration of Suit 42 The owner of the disputed land filed a claim against the predecessor in certain legal heirs in favor of the parties. On the basis of the gifts, the parties' interest was granted by the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs and when the plaintiffs intended to enforce their rights on the basis of this decree, the remaining legal heirs contested them, thus leading them to trial. Forced to file. Defendants - whose appeal failed in 1995 - Appeal failed in the year 2000. Defendants contended that no proper gift was presented by the predecessor in the interest of the proposals and the order passed was invalid in the eyes of the law-giver. Did not challenge the decree of consent in the interest of violating the Land Reform Law, because they themselves were parties to the decree and it is not permissible for them to turn and prove that neither the gift. Has not been given, nor has the consent been given, if the predecessor was taken into account in the interest of the parties, The heirs were also relinquished, because they were getting this title through it. Incidentally, in the circumstances, it can be ineffective only as far as land reform is concerned but not for the gift verification on which the High Court dismissed the request for review. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
