Find a Lawyer

NAZAR HUSSAIN versus HOTE KHAN

Amendment of Section 115, Accuracy Under Section 115, CPC The conclusions of the facts of the courts below the High Court if it does not read inadequate evidence, incorrect writing or material evidence, false assumptions of facts, patent errors of law , If considered, could interfere with such searches. Unverifiable evidence, excessive or excessive jurisdiction, misconduct of power or improper ideology is not supported by evidence

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ASBA v. DILDAR ALI 2010 YLR 193
• ALIYA FARHAN RABBANI v. Mirza FARHAN RABBANI 2010 YLR 196
• MUHAMMAD FIAZ v. Ch. YAQOOB HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 197
• THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS v. MASOOD AZIZ CHAUDHARY 2010 MLD 198
• NAZAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 202
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. MUKHTARAN BIBI 2010 YLR 203
• TARIQ JAMEEL BUTT v. PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. (PECO) through Managing Director 2010 PLC(CS) 204
• EXPRESS LINK FILLING STATION, KADLATHI, SHEIKHUPURA through Managing Partner v. OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman 2010 YLR 206

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes