Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) BOARD OF REVENUE

A. XXIII, R 3 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 (6) (7) Approval of consent for deviation based on such decree, decision of jurisdiction to show consent before the trial court Duty Holder becomes the absolute owner of the suit property upon the submission of the debtor's approval of all his rights in the suit property and the mutation's approval was only a formal process. Such a decree is not required to be executed. Even if such order had not been executed, the Revenue Officer would not have executed such order. Enforcement of the revenue record was under legal obligation whether its execution request was banned or dismissed by judicial precedent.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 181
• LAL KHAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KOTWALI JHANG 2010 PCrLJ 182
• SHABBIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 185
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 2010 YLR 187
• Mst. BUSHRA v. Mst. SHAHNAZ BIBI 2010 YLR 191
• ASBA v. DILDAR ALI 2010 YLR 193
• ALIYA FARHAN RABBANI v. Mirza FARHAN RABBANI 2010 YLR 196
• MUHAMMAD FIAZ v. Ch. YAQOOB HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 197

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

patent advocate from Dinga lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes