Find a Lawyer

MST. BUSHRA versus MST. SHAHNAZ BIBI

Section Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit to recover the shares of the plaintiffs when they have legal heirs. The plaintiff's legal heirs and that the defendant's money was paid to the deceased creditors and there was nothing left to distribute to the legal heirs, the defendants denied having relations with the plaintiffs Their financial position and intent to capture were not included in the statement of compensation amount, claiming that the "creditors' mention of the deceased general's lenders was not sufficient, so the defendants had to testify." Leave it open for the appellate court to examine the entire evidence in its entirety. The record high court refused to interfere with the appellate court's decision. r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• LAL KHAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KOTWALI JHANG 2010 PCrLJ 182
• SHABBIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 185
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 2010 YLR 187
• SHER MUHAMMAD v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) BOARD OF REVENUE 2010 MLD 187
• ASBA v. DILDAR ALI 2010 YLR 193
• ALIYA FARHAN RABBANI v. Mirza FARHAN RABBANI 2010 YLR 196
• MUHAMMAD FIAZ v. Ch. YAQOOB HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 197
• THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS v. MASOOD AZIZ CHAUDHARY 2010 MLD 198

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Arifwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes