THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS versus MASOOD AZIZ CHAUDHARY
A. XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and O VII, Rr 10, 11 Release suit for recovery of money based on checks and leave for defense claim O. When filing a lawsuit by the claimant under XXXVII, return of the case. And the request for rejection, 3, CPC to recover the money, the defendant filed an application for rejection of the plaintiff under Oli VI, R 11, CPC, whose request is already mature Was dismissed as well as the defendant moved a petition for leave to appear and a defense claim which was allowed and instead of complying with the defendant's conditional order, defendant once Then OVII, R 10, applied for the return of the petition filed under CPC and the trial court proceeded to dismiss the defendant's petition for withdrawal. The plaintiff's dismissal was filed against the plaintiff's dismissal order, stating that the claim was not opposed to the plaintiff's claim and the defendant had taken up the jurisdiction of submission. d was questioning the jurisdiction of the court as well as its jurisdiction in the petition for defense of leave, which was appreciated and conditional leave was granted, according to the claim of the defendant in the petition. Refrain from doing. In order to appear and defend the leave, a detailed consideration of the law and the facts of the matter was required, but instead of awaiting their decision by the trial court, the defendant resorted to the provisions of RR 10 of Order VII, The CPC affirmed the request to dismiss the plaintiff. Said by the trial court, in the applications, for an exception
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
