Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder and excellent bail, the grant of further inquiries was named in the FIR and the common role of detention was assigned to the accused while the co-accused Was beaten by the ax. The accused were blamed for not having any injuries on the bodies of the Lalkarva victims. The question of vicarious liability can only be resolved at trial by the person who filed the case only after the recording of the evidence which made the case of the accused a further inquiry, (2) under section 749 Cr. The accused were behind bars and no more wanted for the purpose of investigation. After the arrest of the accused, bail was granted.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ISRAR AHMAD KHAN v. SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2010 YLR 179
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MOHIB TEXTILE MILLS LTD. 2010 CLD 180
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 181
• LAL KHAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KOTWALI JHANG 2010 PCrLJ 182
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 2010 YLR 187
• SHER MUHAMMAD v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) BOARD OF REVENUE 2010 MLD 187
• Mst. BUSHRA v. Mst. SHAHNAZ BIBI 2010 YLR 191
• ASBA v. DILDAR ALI 2010 YLR 193

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firms from Noshki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes