MUHAMMAD RAWAN versus THE STATE THROUGH POLICE STATION, KHANBERY
Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/427/431/353/34 / Gilgit-Baltistan (Authorization and Sovereignty) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Dismiss and attempt to compel sanctions. Delays at the end of the trial were immediately filed by the FIR against those charged under applicable law. The incident took place in broad daylight. Weapons were recovered shortly after the incident. The purpose of the Commission of Crime was set up and witnessed by the three witnesses, including two injured persons whose statements were recorded without delay, the defendant requested a delay in the trial and The challan was submitted on 24th 2008 and thereafter the absence of the defense lawyer, the district attorney or the absence of the presiding officer could not proceed the case. Such delay cannot be termed merely prosecution and This cannot be a good place to approve a bail in the absence of anyone. The order of the specific supply of bail to the co-accused was a challenge, and all that was the case in which a gradual evaluation of the available substance showed that the initial trial was made against the accused, therefore, the Supreme Appellate Court granted the bail to the accused. Was denied the appeal was refused
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
