Section Q Qununununun ehadhadhad ((((((((((((((10)), (10), (10) (10 (10)) (10 (() ( ((((((((((((((((((( The second trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and his trial. The original but lower appellate court reversed its address in relation to the truth of the degree decision, and the decree passed by the lower appellate court was upheld by the Chief Court, damaging any document. Or, without proof of the absence of original documents, secondary evidence of such document was not valid but no analogy can be raised with the plaintiff without checking the actual record of absence of a real BA degree. On the basis of which the letter was issued through the Controller Examinations of the concerned University which examined the question regarding the absence of any evidence. The controller of examinations proved beyond doubt by the certificate of degree in the possession of the plaintiff was the result of not reading the material evidence of the concurrent results of the two courts on the issue of degree accuracy, and such results were of no importance. As a result of the lack of evidence, the Supreme Court upheld the agreement. The two courts below were allowed to be searched and appealed for a restored trial
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
