Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 Qatil Im Bell, Report of the Investigation of a Further Investigation on the Joint Sign Firearms Expert Report, Absent Soon after the Firing But the prosecution's witness saw it. Instead of an accident, he did not have a pistol in his hand, neither was the pistol recovered from him nor was he chewed, the effect of the recovery of the pistol has been effective on the identification of the two accused. There is no firearms expert report available to the prosecution. The fire was one of a series of investigations into the impact of the case against the accused under section 497 (2), which allowed CCP bail to fire whether the pistol was recovered from the accused.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
