Find a Lawyer

SYED MAZHAR ALI SHAH versus VC KIU

Article Gil65 Gilgit-Baltistan Supreme Appellate Court Rules, XX, AXXVII Review of the principles of natural justice of the Supreme Appellate Court's judicial dispute was related to the selection of candidates against vacant positions at the Karakoram International University. The interviewee who had received a valid right to choose on his or her merits on the basis of 40% of the aggregate marks should be dealt with as well as the candidates who were fixed on a contractual basis. Will be entitled to consider. On the basis of their own contract service, the Supreme Court of Appeal directed the university registrar to put the cases of appeals before the selection board for final selection on the merit and appoint the competent authority in light of the recommendations of the selection board. ? Accordingly, the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court late in the revised decision disposed of the petition of the Chief Court

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• SHAKIRULLAH alias DOCTOR v. State 2010 GBLR 280
• HAMAYOON KHAN v. CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION, ISLAMABAD 2010 GBLR 281
• MUHAMMAD NASEEM v. ZAFAR IQBAL, MD NATCO 2010 GBLR 285
• MUHAMMAD RAWAN v. THE STATE through Police Station, Khanbery 2010 GBLR 288
• ASHFAQ v. State 2010 GBLR 295
• JAMSHEED KHAN v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 2010 GBLR 299
• State v. SHAH HUSSAIN 2010 GBLR 301
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Coordinator Sub-Region Office, Gilgit v. KARIM AHMED SHAH 2010 GBLR 305

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Sakrand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes