Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SHAH HUSSAIN

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (v) and 336 of the Shuja'a Umah and subsequent, Medical Report of the Head Injury shows that the injured girl in the head injury. The skull was broken. The accused, having gone through the primary, came to the mischief of Sections 336 and 337A (v) PPC, which had sentenced him to ten and fourteen years imprisonment respectively and was subjected to the prohibition clause of section 497, PC Chief The court erroneously found that the accused was. The defendant is entitled to bail on the basis of further investigation because the accused's case was not a matter of further inquiry as was considered under section 497 (2), the PC order submitted by the Chief Court was set aside and The accused's bail was granted. Allowed

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• MUHAMMAD RAWAN v. THE STATE through Police Station, Khanbery 2010 GBLR 288
• Syed MAZHAR ALI SHAH v. VC KIU 2010 GBLR 291
• ASHFAQ v. State 2010 GBLR 295
• JAMSHEED KHAN v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 2010 GBLR 299
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Coordinator Sub-Region Office, Gilgit v. KARIM AHMED SHAH 2010 GBLR 305
• GHULAM QADIR v. GHULAM ABBAS 2010 GBLR 311
• SALAMAT JAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GILGIT 2010 GBLR 314
• ISLAMIC INVESTMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, ALIABAD v. SULTAN ISHAQ, EX. GENERAL MANAGER, ISLAMIC CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY 2010 GBLR 317

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Kandhkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes