HAMAYOON KHAN versus CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION, ISLAMABAD
O. VIII, R2 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Suit for collection of money, discovery by the trial court and the order issued by the trial court by the High Court. Maintained in your use. The correctness of the jurisdiction of the appellant can neither prove any additional work done by them nor any verbal agreement between the parties regarding the alleged extra work related to the harmony of the two courts in the plaintiff's case. Was fully supported by the evidence on record, so the fact of the matter was that it was not the result of false courts and false evidence being read. Both the courts rejected the facts and the appeal filed by the plaintiff was denied.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
