MUHAMMAD RASHID-UR-REHMAN versus MULTAN ELEOTRIC POWER COMPANY, MULTAN THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Sections 41 and 55 Appeal to the Labor Appellate Tribunal In the present case, the lower court had filed an application for complaint in this case on 20 April 2009, in response to the urgent action, the respondents were instructed that it be proper at a later date. Enter response as. Their objections were considered, which could be decided only after the recording of the evidence, the Labor Court left on the same day to give relief, with such unnecessary rush, the process had ruined the whole process and All matters were dealt with unanimously. The record does not show that the lower court used its discretion with justice in reaching a favorable conclusion to resolve matters. The appellant contended that he was kept in the dark about the registration of the complaint petitions and that he knew of the negative decisions, without losing the depth of the merits of filing the appeal, this case was lower. Sending on seemed fair and fair. It is our responsibility that after keeping in view all the points / objections raised by the respondent, the parties will be given a reasonable opportunity to support their own material tenure, with a direction to redress matters. Present your evidence and decide accordingly. Along with the law, the cases were remanded
