MUHAMMAD NAEEM TARIQ versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, REVENUE DEPARTMENT BOARD OF REVENUE, MULTAN
The dismissal of Appellant's service dismissed as Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (5) and the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), was presented as a charge sheet in which he Was associated with The parties filed the sale proceedings under the prices, irrespective of the valuation table notified by the Deputy Collector finding, the Inquiry Officer was told that the accused against the appellant had been proved and the Punjab Government Servants (Performance and Order) Corruption) has been found to be a criminal offense under the rules. 1975 Authority, in view of the Inquiry Officer's report, on the recommendations of the authorized officer and the record, concluded that the appellant had not presented any fresh evidence for his immunity. The appellant was sent to defense to recover. Appellant was not confirmed about receiving stamp duty in compliance with the orders passed by the civil courts. The Stamp Act Service Tribunal examined the records for minutes at the rates reported in the Valuation Table and found that the registration of the sale deeds was done by the appellant only and no other revenue officer had signed these documents. The appellant was solely responsible for the registration of under-value documents, the appellant charged arbitrary rates without observing the district collector's reported rates and violated the policy guidelines of the department. The disqualification, negligence and rate violation reported by the District Collector proved against appellant that he had been serving in the department for several years. I had to look softly out of service
