MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION)
In the wake of the decision of the Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 189 Supreme Court decision, the appellant's complaint was that after restoring him to the job, the authorities refused to give him back benefits, while his other colleagues. In other cases, these government employees were restored with all previous benefits, which in the previous appeals the service tribunal had presented to the dictum in court, which meant that the Supreme Court maintained This means that the Supreme Court service tribunal has no choice but to provide back benefits to the affected public servants. I was saved. According to Article 189 of the Constitution, to act on the decisions of the Supreme Court, the same facts and circumstances of the case, like the previous appellants, were not only restored to the employees but also to the benefit of the public servants. And such relief was also extended. All the affected public servants were mandates of the law, even if the government employee came to the service tribunal instructing the court to pay all the benefits returned to the appellants during which they were entitled to appeal. \ r \ n
